Year 2008 has been declared by UNESCO as the International Year of Languages.
I was not aware of this until October of this when my interest in languages resurrected in the May. I had 6 units of spanish in college but I do not think I learned anything new from it. What I have of spanish language going in was still the same after I was done with the subject. The best I could remember from two semesters of spanish was of my instructor talking about the hamons of spain. I have better memory of french conjugation, french verbs and nouns from 3 units of college french. This belief was validated when i took diagnostic tests in spanish and french before starting on the courses again. I thought I'll take them up again in place of my MSLIS degree which would have to take a back seat for the next year or so for several reasons. I thought there must be something to show for my time and spanish and french seem like good substitutes.
During the librarians' seminar on multiculturalism in Davao, the acquisitions of another foreign language by a librarian was mentioned as a good tool for a librarian to have, especially if she happened to service a multicultural clientele. I was praised by my colleagues in my forethought, but the possible outcome of learning another language in terms of being a librarian was far from my mind. I just wanted something to occupy me and to show that my spare time is not 100% wasted because I have not learned something new, have not acquired new skills, etc.
Now, officially (officially meaning I now have resources to help me learn--dictionary and manual) two and a half months into spanish and one and a half months into french, I am still better at french. This is may be because spanish is so much integrated, adapted and butchered by Cebuano speakers into the dialect that it took longer to learn, unlearned or relearned several words.
At the start of the Davao seminar, I anticipated language being mentioned as one of many factors of multiculturalism. I also anticipated the mention of the UNESCO declaration, because the declaration was not mere language it encompasses multiculturalism in general. Unfortunately, there was none. If I were one of the speakers, I would have find a way to mention it in my lecture. But I must remember, that we librarians really do not know everything!
I have bookmarked UNESCO because I have just realized it is a very rich source of information, not just for a librarian but for everyone interested in information, education and knowledge.
Wednesday, December 10, 2008
Tuesday, December 9, 2008
Road to hypocrisy and ignorance...
Is filled with PhD's and multi-MS degree holders and some librarians.
I could name friends who are librarians who told me "i get sleepy after the first few pages of reading" and "the thought of reading alone lulled me into sleepiness". And I know of some librarians too who read only memos and official communications and only articles that relate to library science. Librarians are suppose to encourage reading, what I wonder is what type of reading really. What I understand about encouraging reading in the youth is actually reading literature. Now one might say reading library science article is reading literature in library science. What I understand of reading literature too is reading fiction, prose, poetry, short stories, etc. How can a librarian encourage such activities when they themselves do not indulge in it. Isn't that hypocrisy?
I as a librarian was discouraged from reading literature during work hours because it is not in my job description. If that does not show ignorance I don't know what is. Librarians can't at all times say to their library clientele "according to the book review..." we must sometimes have our own opinion on the matter. I realize of course that work time is valuable, but to be told that: "if you no longer have clientele to serve, look for other works to do, backlogs to attend to, but reading fiction or pocket books is not one of the things to do during down time, you may read newspapers and journals some time as you say you do because it is important in your profession to be abreast of events but this also you must put a limit".
The comment still rankles me. I won't stop telling this story until the hypocrites and the ignoramuses are unmasked for what they really are, hypocrites and ignoramuses wearing robes of PhD's and MS degrees.
I could name friends who are librarians who told me "i get sleepy after the first few pages of reading" and "the thought of reading alone lulled me into sleepiness". And I know of some librarians too who read only memos and official communications and only articles that relate to library science. Librarians are suppose to encourage reading, what I wonder is what type of reading really. What I understand about encouraging reading in the youth is actually reading literature. Now one might say reading library science article is reading literature in library science. What I understand of reading literature too is reading fiction, prose, poetry, short stories, etc. How can a librarian encourage such activities when they themselves do not indulge in it. Isn't that hypocrisy?
I as a librarian was discouraged from reading literature during work hours because it is not in my job description. If that does not show ignorance I don't know what is. Librarians can't at all times say to their library clientele "according to the book review..." we must sometimes have our own opinion on the matter. I realize of course that work time is valuable, but to be told that: "if you no longer have clientele to serve, look for other works to do, backlogs to attend to, but reading fiction or pocket books is not one of the things to do during down time, you may read newspapers and journals some time as you say you do because it is important in your profession to be abreast of events but this also you must put a limit".
The comment still rankles me. I won't stop telling this story until the hypocrites and the ignoramuses are unmasked for what they really are, hypocrites and ignoramuses wearing robes of PhD's and MS degrees.
Tuesday, November 25, 2008
Drawing circles around my head
I don't usually get confused by things. In any situation I always, always step back figuratively to observe, think and rethink and rethink before I could make any reasonable decisions. The more somebody pushed me into making a spontaneous decision the more recalcitrant I become.
But then there are people who draw circles around you to get you confused into making decisions you do not want to make. They drive you into a corner and challenge you either to bite their heads off or to just growl in utter frustration.
I entered the room where the House of Delegates convened, confident that I could perform well the duties my council set me to do even if I was just the third appointed member. But at the onset I and my president were at a disadvantaged. We do not have a copy and do not know anything about the election guidelines. My president and I were loathed to agree with some of the delegates about reading the guidelines first before starting the election because doing so would put either our previous president or another officer on the hot seat. So we decide to just wing it, confident we know enough of the Robert's Rules of Order to be effective as representative of our council.
But as it happened no Robert's Rules of Order nor any kind of rule was applied during the initial parts of the election. I challenge everyone to gainsay me. I was so confused by the noise and the voices simultaneously speaking that by the time the winning president was announced all I could do was say to myself, who the hell is she! Was she introduced to us? Did she stand up to be recognized?
I do not know her so I have nothing against her personally. I do not even have a candidate of my own but others have. If the people who nominated her were/are very confident of her capabilities and talent to lead the national council, why afraid to let her go head to head with another candidate? Why block another nomination with an over-hasty closing of nominations?
One nomination, one move to close and one move to second does not make it a plural vote.
I am off to read Robert's Rules of Order.
But then there are people who draw circles around you to get you confused into making decisions you do not want to make. They drive you into a corner and challenge you either to bite their heads off or to just growl in utter frustration.
I entered the room where the House of Delegates convened, confident that I could perform well the duties my council set me to do even if I was just the third appointed member. But at the onset I and my president were at a disadvantaged. We do not have a copy and do not know anything about the election guidelines. My president and I were loathed to agree with some of the delegates about reading the guidelines first before starting the election because doing so would put either our previous president or another officer on the hot seat. So we decide to just wing it, confident we know enough of the Robert's Rules of Order to be effective as representative of our council.
But as it happened no Robert's Rules of Order nor any kind of rule was applied during the initial parts of the election. I challenge everyone to gainsay me. I was so confused by the noise and the voices simultaneously speaking that by the time the winning president was announced all I could do was say to myself, who the hell is she! Was she introduced to us? Did she stand up to be recognized?
I do not know her so I have nothing against her personally. I do not even have a candidate of my own but others have. If the people who nominated her were/are very confident of her capabilities and talent to lead the national council, why afraid to let her go head to head with another candidate? Why block another nomination with an over-hasty closing of nominations?
One nomination, one move to close and one move to second does not make it a plural vote.
I am off to read Robert's Rules of Order.
Thursday, October 30, 2008
Reading
Inherent in all work but never defined and therefore never given weight is the act of reading. The amount and kind of materials read depends upon the kind of trade one practices. The medical doctor reads her medical journals, the secretary her memos. The shopkeeper his trade catalog, stock and deliveries.
Some professions read more than others. Some professions' existence itself depends upon constant reading. One of these professions is librarianship. They read introduction to books, book jackets, table of contents when they catalog; newspapers, magazines and journals when they index. Some librarians too read books that interest them personally. Books which whether they accept it or not, helped them function as better librarians.
Unfortunately much of the public do not understand these librarian activities. Even their fellow professionals do not realize the meaning of these reading activities. The views are at extreme opposites. One view is that librarians' jobs are difficult because of all the readings they do while the other is that librarians had it so easy because all they do is read and read.
Some professions read more than others. Some professions' existence itself depends upon constant reading. One of these professions is librarianship. They read introduction to books, book jackets, table of contents when they catalog; newspapers, magazines and journals when they index. Some librarians too read books that interest them personally. Books which whether they accept it or not, helped them function as better librarians.
Unfortunately much of the public do not understand these librarian activities. Even their fellow professionals do not realize the meaning of these reading activities. The views are at extreme opposites. One view is that librarians' jobs are difficult because of all the readings they do while the other is that librarians had it so easy because all they do is read and read.
Wednesday, October 22, 2008
End of Anonymity
I've been invited to post a blog on a legitimate and serious type of blogging so there goes my anonymity. Basically the readers of that blog would not care very much who posts the blog. But then some inquisitive types would check me out. At some level I am still anonymous, all they would know about me is that I am a librarian from the Eastern Visayas.
But I rather like being a contributor too. I could practice weaving words that way. Also the older librarians said, "accept this responsibility, it's grooming the new generation".
New generation of librarians are suppose to be pro-active, dynamic, aware, involved, etc. If I continue with this streak, I could be like that, but still trying to be one takes a whole lot of effort from me. Psychologically, I am made to be the traditional type of librarian.
But I rather like being a contributor too. I could practice weaving words that way. Also the older librarians said, "accept this responsibility, it's grooming the new generation".
New generation of librarians are suppose to be pro-active, dynamic, aware, involved, etc. If I continue with this streak, I could be like that, but still trying to be one takes a whole lot of effort from me. Psychologically, I am made to be the traditional type of librarian.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
